Automation index
How much of a Printer technician’s job can AI already do?
A jam log comes earlier. Leaving the office printing without inking the floor do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Printer technician
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#319 / 643
View rankingPrinter technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Log, count and the maintenance kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Jam, fuser and toner on the floor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Network, queues and the wrong driver.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Contract, visits and the machine that is done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The office at peak and not stopping invoicing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That it prints, and not swapping the fuser blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- jams
- fuser
- maintenance kits
- print queues
- toner
- service contracts
- drivers
- copy counts
Sources for this job· O*NET 49-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 7421
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131