Automation index
How much of a Printer technician’s job can AI already do?
A jam log comes earlier. Leaving the office printing without inking the floor do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Printer technician
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#319 / 643
View rankingPrinter technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Log, count and the maintenance kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Jam, fuser and toner on the floor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Network, queues and the wrong driver.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Contract, visits and the machine that is done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The office at peak and not stopping invoicing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That it prints, and not swapping the fuser blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- jams
- fuser
- maintenance kits
- print queues
- toner
- service contracts
- drivers
- copy counts
Sources for this job· O*NET 49-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 7421
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211