Automation index
How much of a Printer technician’s job can AI already do?
A jam log comes earlier. Leaving the office printing without inking the floor do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Printer technician
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#350 / 743
View rankingPrinter technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Log, count and the maintenance kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Jam, fuser and toner on the floor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Network, queues and the wrong driver.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Contract, visits and the machine that is done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The office at peak and not stopping invoicing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That it prints, and not swapping the fuser blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- jams
- fuser
- maintenance kits
- print queues
- toner
- service contracts
- drivers
- copy counts
Sources for this job· O*NET 49-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 7421
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141