Automation index
How much of a Printer technician’s job can AI already do?
A jam log comes earlier. Leaving the office printing without inking the floor do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Printer technician
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#314 / 623
View rankingPrinter technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Log, count and the maintenance kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Jam, fuser and toner on the floor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Network, queues and the wrong driver.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Contract, visits and the machine that is done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The office at peak and not stopping invoicing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That it prints, and not swapping the fuser blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- jams
- fuser
- maintenance kits
- print queues
- toner
- service contracts
- drivers
- copy counts
Sources for this job· O*NET 49-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 7421
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 623
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142