Automation index
How much of a Prison educator’s job can AI already do?
A wing pathway comes earlier. Being in the yard so the workshop does not go sideways do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Prison educator
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#429 / 653
View rankingPrison educator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Programmes, reports and the treatment board.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Wing, yard and the fight that blows up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Workshop, studies and the one who shows up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Family, leave and the note to the lawyer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The hard inmate and not losing authority.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The bond inside, and it not being paper.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- treatment programmes
- prison workshops
- the yard
- treatment board
- leave reports
- the wing
- prison study
- yard conflict
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1092.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131