Automation index
How much of a Prison educator’s job can AI already do?
A wing pathway comes earlier. Being in the yard so the workshop does not go sideways do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Prison educator
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#429 / 653
View rankingPrison educator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Programmes, reports and the treatment board.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Wing, yard and the fight that blows up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Workshop, studies and the one who shows up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Family, leave and the note to the lawyer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The hard inmate and not losing authority.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The bond inside, and it not being paper.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- treatment programmes
- prison workshops
- the yard
- treatment board
- leave reports
- the wing
- prison study
- yard conflict
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1092.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211