Automation index
How much of a Prison educator’s job can AI already do?
A wing pathway comes earlier. Being in the yard so the workshop does not go sideways do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Prison educator
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#446 / 673
View rankingPrison educator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Programmes, reports and the treatment board.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Wing, yard and the fight that blows up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Workshop, studies and the one who shows up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Family, leave and the note to the lawyer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The hard inmate and not losing authority.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The bond inside, and it not being paper.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- treatment programmes
- prison workshops
- the yard
- treatment board
- leave reports
- the wing
- prison study
- yard conflict
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1092.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Spanish language teacher
22%
#391 / 673
View rankingSpanish language teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the commentary and the rubric.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they write with sense, and not copying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- text commentary
- writing
- speaking
- spelling
- language rubrics
- plagiarism
- paragraphs
- reading
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330