Automation index

How much of a Probation officer’s job can AI already do?

A reporting calendar comes earlier. Stopping reoffending and calling it when it turns do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

24%

AI can already do 24% of this job.

#271 / 673

Probation officer

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
The order plan, reporting and the conditions. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Visit, interview and what they do not say. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Reports to the judge and the breach. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	32%	+5.1
Network, work and the resource that is not there. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The victim, the offender and not mixing roles. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
Call it in time, and not dressing the follow-up. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		24%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

22%

#391 / 673

Spanish language teacher

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Reading, the commentary and the rubric. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low