Automation index
How much of a Professional athlete’s job can AI already do?
A load plan and a video analysis come earlier. Competing, getting hurt, and coming back do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Professional athlete
15%
AI can already do 15% of this job.
#641 / 653
View rankingProfessional athlete
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Load plans, nutrition and video analysis.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 35% | +5.6 |
Social, contracts and travel diary.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 28% | +3.9 |
Train and compete the craft.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 26% | 4% | +1 |
Physio, sleep and prevention.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 8% | +1.3 |
Wear the shirt, press and the dressing room.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 10% | +1.4 |
Manage an injury and the end of a career.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 15% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Load plans, nutrition and video analysis
- Social, contracts and travel diary
- Train and compete the craft
- Physio, sleep and prevention
- Manage an injury and the end of a career
- deportista
- atleta profesional
- futbolista
- professional athlete
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2021.00· ESCO/ISCO 3421
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131