Automation index
How much of a Property developer’s job can AI already do?
A development model comes earlier. Putting the building up and selling it without rows do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Property developer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#174 / 623
View rankingProperty developer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Land, licence and the model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Works, the builder and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Sell, the plan and the one who reserves.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Bank, the facility and the one that is cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Neighbours, the objection and not hiding the impact.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Put it up and sell without rows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- land
- licences
- development model
- sell units
- development finance
- objections
- reservations
- the build
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9021.00· ESCO/ISCO 3334
IS WORK OVER?
Actuary
32%
#25 / 623
View rankingActuary
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Run models, reserves and sensitivities.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 24% | 55% | +13.2 |
Draft technical reports and memos.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Choose assumptions, tables and criteria.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Explain to the board and the supervisor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 15% | +2.4 |
Validate data quality and bias.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
Signed opinion and professional liability.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 12% | 18% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 32% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Run models, reserves and sensitivities
- Draft technical reports and memos
- Choose assumptions, tables and criteria
- Explain to the board and the supervisor
- Validate data quality and bias
- Signed opinion and professional liability
- actuario
- actuary
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2120