Automation index
How much of a Property developer’s job can AI already do?
A development model comes earlier. Putting the building up and selling it without rows do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Property developer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#178 / 643
View rankingProperty developer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Land, licence and the model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Works, the builder and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Sell, the plan and the one who reserves.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Bank, the facility and the one that is cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Neighbours, the objection and not hiding the impact.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Put it up and sell without rows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- land
- licences
- development model
- sell units
- development finance
- objections
- reservations
- the build
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9021.00· ESCO/ISCO 3334
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131