Automation index
How much of a Property developer’s job can AI already do?
A development model comes earlier. Putting the building up and selling it without rows do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Property developer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#174 / 633
View rankingProperty developer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Land, licence and the model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Works, the builder and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Sell, the plan and the one who reserves.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Bank, the facility and the one that is cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Neighbours, the objection and not hiding the impact.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Put it up and sell without rows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- land
- licences
- development model
- sell units
- development finance
- objections
- reservations
- the build
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9021.00· ESCO/ISCO 3334
IS WORK OVER?
Research scientist
27%
#139 / 633
View rankingResearch scientist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Literature review, figures and drafts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 48% | +10.6 |
Analysis, code and experiment boards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 42% | +7.6 |
Design the study and the controls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Run the experiment or the fieldwork.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Lead a group, theses and authorship fights.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
Win funding and answer reviewers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Literature review, figures and drafts
- Analysis, code and experiment boards
- Design the study and the controls
- Run the experiment or the fieldwork
- Lead a group, theses and authorship fights
- Win funding and answer reviewers
- cientifico
- investigador
- research scientist
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1029.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131