Automation index
How much of a Props master’s job can AI already do?
A props list comes earlier. The object being there, working and not breaking on stage do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Props master
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#479 / 633
View rankingProps master
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
List, references and the budget.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Make, adapt and the one that will not fit the hand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Rehearsal, the change and the one that vanishes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Show, tables and the preset.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The actor, the whim and not improvising the weapon.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
That it is there, and not breaking on stage.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- props lists
- presets
- adapt objects
- props rehearsals
- show tables
- stage weapons
- references
- props budget
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-1027.00· ESCO/ISCO 3435
IS WORK OVER?
Copy editor
31%
#32 / 633
View rankingCopy editor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Spelling, agreement and consistency.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Style, repetition and sentence rhythm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Queries to the author, grey areas and the house style.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Second proofs, PDF and last-minute typos.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 22% | +4 |
Deadlines with publisher, layout and translation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Judgement, not over-rewriting, and the typo that remains.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- copy-edit
- spelling and punctuation
- unify style
- catch typos
- house style
- second proofs
- author queries
- avoid over-editing
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2641