Automation index
How much of a Psychiatrist’s job can AI already do?
A test and a first report come earlier. Sitting with someone in crisis and titrating the drug do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Psychiatrist
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#448 / 653
View rankingPsychiatrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Read history, scales and a first diagnosis.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Interview, crisis and verbal containment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Titrate medication and explain effects.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Reports, court notes and coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Family, admission and discharge.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
On-call, team and not leaving someone alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Read history, scales and a first diagnosis
- Interview, crisis and verbal containment
- Titrate medication and explain effects
- Reports, court notes and coordination
- Family, admission and discharge
- psiquiatra
- psychiatrist
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1223.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131