Automation index
How much of a Psychiatrist’s job can AI already do?
A test and a first report come earlier. Sitting with someone in crisis and titrating the drug do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Psychiatrist
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#448 / 653
View rankingPsychiatrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Read history, scales and a first diagnosis.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Interview, crisis and verbal containment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Titrate medication and explain effects.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Reports, court notes and coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Family, admission and discharge.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
On-call, team and not leaving someone alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Read history, scales and a first diagnosis
- Interview, crisis and verbal containment
- Titrate medication and explain effects
- Reports, court notes and coordination
- Family, admission and discharge
- psiquiatra
- psychiatrist
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1223.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211