Automation index
How much of a Psychiatrist’s job can AI already do?
A test and a first report come earlier. Sitting with someone in crisis and titrating the drug do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Psychiatrist
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#496 / 713
View rankingPsychiatrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Read history, scales and a first diagnosis.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Interview, crisis and verbal containment.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Titrate medication and explain effects.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Reports, court notes and coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Family, admission and discharge.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
On-call, team and not leaving someone alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Read history, scales and a first diagnosis
- Interview, crisis and verbal containment
- Titrate medication and explain effects
- Reports, court notes and coordination
- Family, admission and discharge
- psiquiatra
- psychiatrist
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1223.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Instructional designer
27%
#158 / 713
View rankingInstructional designer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Aim, the storyboard and the module.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Pilot, the learner and what is not understood.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Activity, the feedback and not putting a silly test.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
LMS, the figure and not inflating completion.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the deadline and not cutting the practice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That they learn, and not leaving the empty video.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- course storyboard
- modules
- learner pilot
- activities
- LMS
- completion
- feedback
- not a silly test
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-9031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2351