Automation index

How much of a Public health officer’s job can AI already do?

An outbreak comes earlier on the sheet. Going into the field and actually cutting it do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

22%

AI can already do 22% of this job.

#422 / 673

Public health officer

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Surveillance, the indicator and the alert. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Outbreak, the questionnaire and the one who will not answer. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Field, the source and shutting the premises. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Report, the mayor and not softening the figure. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Vaccination, coverage and the rumour. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
Cut the outbreak, and not softening it. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

22%

#391 / 673

Spanish language teacher

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Reading, the commentary and the rubric. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low