IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

Can AI do the work of a QA tester?

Today an AI can already do 38% of this job. Architecture, the hard calls, and review still need someone who has broken production.

It does not turn that percentage into a forecast of layoffs.

Task comparison

QA tester

Where the time goes

Score = Σ (weight × saving). Weight is our estimate from frequency, not a time share published by O*NET. Saving is separate.

Weights are our estimate from O*NET frequency (FT). O*NET does not publish % of the week.

TaskShareAIAdds
Identify, analyze, and document problems with program function, output, online screen, or content.
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

12%55%+6.6
Document software defects, using a bug tracking system, and report defects to software developers.
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

11%55%+6.1
Install, maintain, or use software testing programs.
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

8%28%+2.2
Monitor program performance to ensure efficient and problem-free operations.
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

6%28%+1.7
Develop testing programs that address areas such as database impacts, software scenarios, regression testing, negative testing, error or bug retests, or usability.
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

6%48%+2.9
Document test procedures to ensure replicability and compliance with standards.
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

6%55%+3.3
Create or maintain databases of known test defects.
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

6%48%+2.9
Provide feedback and recommendations to developers on software usability and functionality.
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

6%28%+1.7
Other less frequent tasks (weight estimated from frequency).
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

39%28%+10.9
Total100%38%

Modelled week 100% · Public evidence 0% · Estimate 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills this job uses

  • internal risk management policy
  • ICT quality policy
  • software anomalies
  • levels of software testing
  • quality standards
  • quality assurance methodologies
  • ICT process quality models
  • set quality assurance objectives
  • ensure continuous preparedness for audits
  • comply with legal regulations

Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1253.00· ESCO/ISCO 2519

Executive chef

Where the time goes

Score = Σ (weight × saving). Weight is our estimate from frequency, not a time share published by O*NET. Saving is separate.

Weights are our estimate from O*NET frequency (FT). O*NET does not publish % of the week.

TaskShareAIAdds
Menus, dish sheets and food cost.
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

18%38%+6.8
Orders, suppliers and waste.
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

16%28%+4.5
Pass, plating and service pace.
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

20%10%+2
Lead the brigade, shifts and conflicts.
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

16%12%+1.9
Cook on the line and correct doneness.
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

16%15%+2.4
Hygiene, audits and the house’s name.
Estimate

No public source pins this saving. It is an estimate of the method.

14%12%+1.7
Total100%19%

Modelled week 100% · Public evidence 0% · Estimate 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills this job uses

  • cook
  • mise en place
  • dishes
  • bake
  • Menus, dish sheets and food cost
  • Orders, suppliers and waste
  • Pass, plating and service pace
  • Lead the brigade, shifts and conflicts
  • Cook on the line and correct doneness
  • Hygiene, audits and the house’s name

Sources for this job· O*NET 35-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3434

Analyse my job

Nearby in the ranking

  1. 08Management consultant39%
  2. 09SEO specialist39%
  3. 10Project manager38%
  4. 12DevOps engineer37%
  5. 13Senior developer37%
  6. 14Lab technician37%