Automation index
How much of a Radiation oncologist’s job can AI already do?
Assisted contouring comes earlier. Setting the field and not burning healthy tissue do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Radiation oncologist
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#311 / 633
View rankingRadiation oncologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Contouring, fractions and the dose plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Clinic, the tumour and what can be irradiated.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Simulation, immobilisation and the machine day.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Side effects, pauses and the patient who cannot take it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Board, the surgeon and the medical oncologist.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Signing the plan and the dose that does not erase.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- contouring
- plan radiotherapy
- dosimetry
- RT simulation
- fractions
- tumour board
- radiation effects
- immobilise the patient
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1224.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Copy editor
31%
#32 / 633
View rankingCopy editor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Spelling, agreement and consistency.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Style, repetition and sentence rhythm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Queries to the author, grey areas and the house style.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Second proofs, PDF and last-minute typos.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 22% | +4 |
Deadlines with publisher, layout and translation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Judgement, not over-rewriting, and the typo that remains.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- copy-edit
- spelling and punctuation
- unify style
- catch typos
- house style
- second proofs
- author queries
- avoid over-editing
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2641