Automation index
How much of a Radiation oncologist’s job can AI already do?
Assisted contouring comes earlier. Setting the field and not burning healthy tissue do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Radiation oncologist
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#326 / 683
View rankingRadiation oncologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Contouring, fractions and the dose plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Clinic, the tumour and what can be irradiated.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Simulation, immobilisation and the machine day.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Side effects, pauses and the patient who cannot take it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Board, the surgeon and the medical oncologist.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Signing the plan and the dose that does not erase.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- contouring
- plan radiotherapy
- dosimetry
- RT simulation
- fractions
- tumour board
- radiation effects
- immobilise the patient
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1224.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Schools inspector
27%
#172 / 683
View rankingSchools inspector
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Visit, the rubric and the timetable.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Classroom, what happens and not the slide deck.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Report, the school and not softening it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Appeal, the union and not yielding the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The minister, the pressure and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Say what is there, and not what they want to hear.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- inspection visits
- rubrics
- school reports
- real classrooms
- appeals
- not soften
- the department
- school evaluation
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2422