Automation index
How much of a Radio host’s job can AI already do?
A rundown and a clip come earlier. Filling the air when the line drops does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Radio host
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#347 / 633
View rankingRadio host
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Rundown, clips and a first script.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
On air, interviews and a silence that weighs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 20% | 12% | +2.4 |
Guests, producer and real time.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Edit, podcast and the show’s socials.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Voice, shifts and not going blank.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Not saying something you cannot take back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Rundown, clips and a first script
- Guests, producer and real time
- Edit, podcast and the show’s socials
- Voice, shifts and not going blank
- Not saying something you cannot take back
- locutor
- locutora
- radio host
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-3011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2656
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 633
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142