Automation index
How much of a Red Cross volunteer’s job can AI already do?
A post protocol comes earlier. Getting to the one who drops without playing doctor do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Red Cross volunteer
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#658 / 743
View rankingRed Cross volunteer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Post, the kit and the radio.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Street, the one who drops and first aid.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Shelter, the night and the one who will not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Emergency, command and not playing clinician.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The professional, the line and not getting in the way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Get there, and not playing doctor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Red Cross posts
- first aid
- shelters
- radio
- volunteer kit
- not play doctor
- emergencies
- nights
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 3412
IS WORK OVER?
Geotechnical engineer
22%
#398 / 743
View rankingGeotechnical engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Borehole, the sample and the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, the water table and the one that was not read.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Foundations, the clay and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Slope, the factor and not signing the one that slips.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The architect, the rush and not jumping to a yes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
If it stands, sign it. And not hiding the clay.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- boreholes
- water table
- clays
- foundations
- slopes
- soil samples
- geotech reports
- factors of safety
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2151.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142