IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Reliability engineer’s job can AI already do?

An MTBF comes earlier. It not dropping at three without hiding the spare do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Reliability engineer

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%48%+8.6
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • MTBF
  • Pareto
  • root causes
  • critical spares
  • RCM
  • failures
  • maintenance plans
  • not patch twice

Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141

QA automation engineer

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Test, the selector and the flake.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%48%+8.6
Pipeline, the green and the one that lies.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Bug, the repro and not closing it blind.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Data, the environment and not sharing prod.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The developer, the rush and not skipping the one that fails.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Catch the bug, and not painting a lying green.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • automated tests
  • selectors
  • flakes
  • QA pipelines
  • repro
  • environments
  • lying green
  • debug tests

Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1253.00· ESCO/ISCO 2519

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 179Cost engineer27%
  2. 180Energy engineer27%
  3. 181Packaging engineer27%
  4. 183Lighting engineer27%
  5. 184Materials engineer27%
  6. 185QA automation engineer27%