Automation index
How much of a Residential porter’s job can AI already do?
A fault sheet comes earlier. Being there when it floods without losing the master key do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Residential porter
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#630 / 743
View rankingResidential porter
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Shift, the sheet and the letterboxes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Hall, the neighbour and the one who is not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Fault, the water and calling it in.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Move, the lift and not scratching.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The residents, the complaint and not taking sides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Be there when it floods, and not losing the master.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- fault sheets
- master key
- the hall
- letterboxes
- floods
- moves
- the residents
- not take sides
Sources for this job· O*NET 39-6012.00· ESCO/ISCO 9629
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141