Automation index

How much of a Residential youth worker’s job can AI already do?

An incident sheet comes earlier. Being there at the spike without them getting hurt do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

19%

AI can already do 19% of this job.

#545 / 693

Residential youth worker

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Shift, the sheet and the group. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	32%	+5.1
Spike, the hold and not humiliating. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	22%	8%	+1.8
Night, the abscond and calling it in. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Court, the report and not dressing it. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The family, the visit and not taking sides. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	18%	+2.9
Be there at the spike, and that they do not get hurt. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	14%	12%	+1.7
Total	100%		19%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

22%

#405 / 693

Spanish language teacher

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Reading, the commentary and the rubric. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low