Automation index
How much of a Restaurant maître’s job can AI already do?
A floor plan and a booking come earlier. A Saturday room that actually breathes does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Restaurant maître
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#522 / 653
View rankingRestaurant maître
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Bookings, floor plan and briefing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Greet, seat and read the room.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 20% | 12% | +2.4 |
Floor team, passes and complaints.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Menu, wine and suggestions.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Close, till and reviews.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Not sinking a service or a waiter.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Bookings, floor plan and briefing
- Greet, seat and read the room
- Floor team, passes and complaints
- Menu, wine and suggestions
- Close, till and reviews
- Not sinking a service or a waiter
- jefe de sala
- maitre
Sources for this job· O*NET 35-1012.00· ESCO/ISCO 1412
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131