Automation index
How much of a Revenue manager’s job can AI already do?
A pickup comes earlier. Raising the rate without emptying the hotel do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Revenue manager
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#175 / 633
View rankingRevenue manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Pickup, competitors and the rate.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Channels, overbooking and the one left on the street.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Events, the holiday and not sleeping on the price.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, management and the staff cut.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Sales, the group and not giving the room away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
A high rate and a full house, not empty.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- pickup
- rates
- channels
- overbooking
- holidays
- groups
- competitors
- rooms
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9081.00· ESCO/ISCO 1411
IS WORK OVER?
Criminologist
29%
#57 / 633
View rankingCriminologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, maps and the victimisation report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Profiles, reoffending and programme evaluation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, interviews and what the spreadsheet misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Police, judges and the measure under debate.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Prevention, the neighbourhood and the programme that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The opinion, and not selling magic recipes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- crime maps
- study reoffending
- victimisation
- evaluate programmes
- situational prevention
- criminological profiles
- reports for judges
- fieldwork
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2632