Automation index
How much of a Robotics engineer’s job can AI already do?
A path and a twin come earlier. Putting the robot on the line without taking anyone with it do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Robotics engineer
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#234 / 633
View rankingRobotics engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Paths, PLC and the cell twin.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Cell, grippers and the cycle that will not close.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Safety, fencing and CE validation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Maintenance, backups and the overwritten program.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, takt and the robot that stops.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it takes nobody with it, and signing the cell.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- program robots
- paths
- robot cells
- safety fencing
- cell PLC
- CE validation
- grippers
- takt
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149
IS WORK OVER?
Cartographer
31%
#31 / 633
View rankingCartographer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Sources, OSM, satellite and generalisation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Symbology, type and visual hierarchy.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Projections, scales and getting the heights right.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Review with the client, the field and the lie in the data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Print maps, web maps and updates.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Credit, metadata and owning the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- make maps
- generalise cartography
- symbology
- choose projection
- visual hierarchy
- update OSM
- web maps
- maps that do not lie
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-1021.00· ESCO/ISCO 2165