Automation index
How much of a Robotics engineer’s job can AI already do?
A path and a twin come earlier. Putting the robot on the line without taking anyone with it do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Robotics engineer
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#239 / 643
View rankingRobotics engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Paths, PLC and the cell twin.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Cell, grippers and the cycle that will not close.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Safety, fencing and CE validation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Maintenance, backups and the overwritten program.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, takt and the robot that stops.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it takes nobody with it, and signing the cell.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- program robots
- paths
- robot cells
- safety fencing
- cell PLC
- CE validation
- grippers
- takt
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211