Automation index
How much of a Sailor’s job can AI already do?
A log and a checklist come earlier. A deck, a line, and a foreign port do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Sailor
17%
AI can already do 17% of this job.
#612 / 653
View rankingSailor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Log, checklists and paper watches.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Charts, weather and passage planning.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 25% | +3.5 |
Deck, lines, cargo and upkeep.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Watch, helm and lookout.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Emergencies, abandon ship and fire.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Life aboard, ports and fatigue.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 17% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Log, checklists and paper watches
- Charts, weather and passage planning
- Deck, lines, cargo and upkeep
- Watch, helm and lookout
- Emergencies, abandon ship and fire
- Life aboard, ports and fatigue
- marinero
- sailor
- gente de mar
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-5011.00· ESCO/ISCO 8350
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131