Automation index
How much of a SAP specialist’s job can AI already do?
A customising and a report come earlier. Payroll coming out on the 30th does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
SAP specialist
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#224 / 633
View rankingSAP specialist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Customising, specs and module tests.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Integrations, IDocs and interface faults.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Key user, training and resistance.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Go-lives and windows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Documentation, authorisations and audit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Not leaving a company unable to invoice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Customising, specs and module tests
- Integrations, IDocs and interface faults
- Key user, training and resistance
- Go-lives and windows
- Documentation, authorisations and audit
- Not leaving a company unable to invoice
- especialista sap
- consultor sap
- erp specialist
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1211.00· ESCO/ISCO 2511
IS WORK OVER?
Agile coach
24%
#257 / 633
View rankingAgile coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Boards, metrics and the cadence design.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The real retro and the elephant in the room.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Train, unblock and the manager who will not let go.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Scale, dependencies and fake agile.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Conflict, power and not selling extra frameworks.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they stop faking it, and not inflating velocity.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- retros
- agile cadence
- unblock teams
- flow metrics
- fake agile
- agile training
- dependencies
- velocity
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1111.00· ESCO/ISCO 2421