Automation index
How much of a SAP specialist’s job can AI already do?
A customising and a report come earlier. Payroll coming out on the 30th does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
SAP specialist
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#229 / 643
View rankingSAP specialist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Customising, specs and module tests.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Integrations, IDocs and interface faults.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Key user, training and resistance.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Go-lives and windows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Documentation, authorisations and audit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Not leaving a company unable to invoice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Customising, specs and module tests
- Integrations, IDocs and interface faults
- Key user, training and resistance
- Go-lives and windows
- Documentation, authorisations and audit
- Not leaving a company unable to invoice
- especialista sap
- consultor sap
- erp specialist
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1211.00· ESCO/ISCO 2511
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131