Automation index
How much of a SAP specialist’s job can AI already do?
A customising and a report come earlier. Payroll coming out on the 30th does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
SAP specialist
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#258 / 733
View rankingSAP specialist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Customising, specs and module tests.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Integrations, IDocs and interface faults.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Key user, training and resistance.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Go-lives and windows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Documentation, authorisations and audit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Not leaving a company unable to invoice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Customising, specs and module tests
- Integrations, IDocs and interface faults
- Key user, training and resistance
- Go-lives and windows
- Documentation, authorisations and audit
- Not leaving a company unable to invoice
- especialista sap
- consultor sap
- erp specialist
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1211.00· ESCO/ISCO 2511
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141