Automation index
How much of a SAP specialist’s job can AI already do?
A customising and a report come earlier. Payroll coming out on the 30th does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
SAP specialist
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#224 / 633
View rankingSAP specialist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Customising, specs and module tests.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Integrations, IDocs and interface faults.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Key user, training and resistance.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Go-lives and windows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Documentation, authorisations and audit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Not leaving a company unable to invoice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Customising, specs and module tests
- Integrations, IDocs and interface faults
- Key user, training and resistance
- Go-lives and windows
- Documentation, authorisations and audit
- Not leaving a company unable to invoice
- especialista sap
- consultor sap
- erp specialist
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1211.00· ESCO/ISCO 2511
IS WORK OVER?
Research scientist
27%
#139 / 633
View rankingResearch scientist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Literature review, figures and drafts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 48% | +10.6 |
Analysis, code and experiment boards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 42% | +7.6 |
Design the study and the controls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Run the experiment or the fieldwork.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Lead a group, theses and authorship fights.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
Win funding and answer reviewers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Literature review, figures and drafts
- Analysis, code and experiment boards
- Design the study and the controls
- Run the experiment or the fieldwork
- Lead a group, theses and authorship fights
- Win funding and answer reviewers
- cientifico
- investigador
- research scientist
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1029.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131