Automation index
How much of a Science teacher’s job can AI already do?
A lab practical comes earlier. Them not burning themselves and understanding what they measured do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Science teacher
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#462 / 773
View rankingScience teacher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Practical, the protocol and the kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Lab, the bunsen and the one who will not read.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Data, the graph and not inventing the point.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Exam, the formula and getting them to explain.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The damage, the note and not leaving the acid open.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they do not burn, and understand what they measured.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- lab practicals
- bunsen
- science protocols
- graphs
- formulae
- acid
- incident notes
- lab safety
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330
IS WORK OVER?
Front-end developer
27%
#157 / 773
View rankingFront-end developer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Component, states and the design.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Accessible, the keyboard and the reader.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Contrast, the token and not leaving it dead.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Performance, the weight and not adding the extra library.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The designer, the pixel and not fighting for sport.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it works from the keyboard, and not leaving the contrast.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- components
- accessibility
- keyboard
- contrast
- tokens
- front-end performance
- libraries
- write interface
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1254.00· ESCO/ISCO 2513