Automation index

How much of a Science teacher’s job can AI already do?

A lab practical comes earlier. Them not burning themselves and understanding what they measured do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

22%

AI can already do 22% of this job.

#386 / 673

Science teacher

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Practical, the protocol and the kit. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Lab, the bunsen and the one who will not read. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Data, the graph and not inventing the point. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Exam, the formula and getting them to explain. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
The damage, the note and not leaving the acid open. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they do not burn, and understand what they measured. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

22%

#391 / 673

Spanish language teacher

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Reading, the commentary and the rubric. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low