Automation index
How much of a Section supervisor’s job can AI already do?
A section planogram comes earlier. The shelf being there and the shift running do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Section supervisor
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#337 / 643
View rankingSection supervisor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Section, planogram and the order.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Shift, the gap and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Customer, the complaint and the one who cannot find it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Shrink, dates and not hiding them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The store manager, the peak and not leaving the shelf empty.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The shelf, and the shift standing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- section
- planogram
- shrink
- dates
- store shifts
- complaints
- section orders
- gaps
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 5222
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131