Automation index
How much of a Section supervisor’s job can AI already do?
A section planogram comes earlier. The shelf being there and the shift running do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Section supervisor
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#331 / 623
View rankingSection supervisor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Section, planogram and the order.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Shift, the gap and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Customer, the complaint and the one who cannot find it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Shrink, dates and not hiding them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The store manager, the peak and not leaving the shelf empty.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The shelf, and the shift standing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- section
- planogram
- shrink
- dates
- store shifts
- complaints
- section orders
- gaps
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 5222
IS WORK OVER?
Packaging engineer
27%
#161 / 623
View rankingPackaging engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Spec, 3D and the drop test.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
The packing line and the one that will not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Material, recyclability and unit cost.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Supplier, die and pack colour.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Marketing, legal and not lying on the pack.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it survives the trip, and not oversizing the plastic.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- design packs
- drop test
- packing line
- recyclability
- die-cut
- unit cost
- pack spec
- 3D prototype
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141