Automation index
How much of a Section supervisor’s job can AI already do?
A section planogram comes earlier. The shelf being there and the shift running do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Section supervisor
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#393 / 773
View rankingSection supervisor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Section, planogram and the order.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Shift, the gap and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Customer, the complaint and the one who cannot find it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Shrink, dates and not hiding them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The store manager, the peak and not leaving the shelf empty.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The shelf, and the shift standing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- section
- planogram
- shrink
- dates
- store shifts
- complaints
- section orders
- gaps
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 5222
IS WORK OVER?
QA automation engineer
27%
#192 / 773
View rankingQA automation engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Test, the selector and the flake.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Pipeline, the green and the one that lies.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Bug, the repro and not closing it blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Data, the environment and not sharing prod.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The developer, the rush and not skipping the one that fails.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Catch the bug, and not painting a lying green.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- automated tests
- selectors
- flakes
- QA pipelines
- repro
- environments
- lying green
- debug tests
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1253.00· ESCO/ISCO 2519