Automation index
How much of a Section supervisor’s job can AI already do?
A section planogram comes earlier. The shelf being there and the shift running do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Section supervisor
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#331 / 633
View rankingSection supervisor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Section, planogram and the order.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Shift, the gap and the one who is late.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Customer, the complaint and the one who cannot find it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Shrink, dates and not hiding them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The store manager, the peak and not leaving the shelf empty.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The shelf, and the shift standing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- section
- planogram
- shrink
- dates
- store shifts
- complaints
- section orders
- gaps
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 5222
IS WORK OVER?
Station master
23%
#302 / 633
View rankingStation master
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Graph, orders and the station log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Platforms, the crossing and the late train.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Staff, shifts and the ticket-office gap.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Incident, passengers and the PA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Works, closures and leaving nobody on the platform.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they do not meet, and signing the graph.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- train graph
- orders
- platforms
- ticket office
- PA
- line crossings
- station shifts
- station logs
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-4031.00· ESCO/ISCO 4323