Automation index
How much of a Seismologist’s job can AI already do?
A catalogue comes earlier. Locating the quake without over-alarming do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Seismologist
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#182 / 643
View rankingSeismologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Network, catalogue and the location.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Quake, the analysis and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Alert, civil protection and not jumping.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Field, the station and the one that dies.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The press, the rumour and not scaring.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Locate, and not over-alarming.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- quake catalogues
- locate quakes
- seismic network
- alerts
- civil protection
- stations
- rumours
- quake analysis
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-2042.00· ESCO/ISCO 2114
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131