Automation index
How much of a SEM specialist’s job can AI already do?
A campaign and an ad come earlier. Spending the budget on people who buy do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
SEM specialist
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#97 / 643
View rankingSEM specialist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Campaigns, keywords and Quality Score.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Landing, tracking and the conversion that misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The client who wants more clicks for less.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Reports, copy and the ad A/B.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Legal, brands and the claim you cannot make.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Spend on buyers, and not inflating impressions.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- SEM campaigns
- keywords
- Quality Score
- landings
- conversion tracking
- ad A/B
- Google Ads
- media budget
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1161.00· ESCO/ISCO 2431
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131