Automation index
How much of a Shelf replenisher’s job can AI already do?
A wave comes earlier. Filling the shelf without blocking the aisle do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Shelf replenisher
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#435 / 633
View rankingShelf replenisher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Wave, location and the cage.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Shelf, date and the one at the back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Aisle, the customer and not blocking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Out of stock, calling it and the gap.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The peak, overtime and not mixing batches.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Shelf full, and aisle clear.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- waves
- the shelf
- dates
- aisles
- stock-outs
- cages
- batches
- gaps
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-5081.00· ESCO/ISCO 9334
IS WORK OVER?
Aid worker
23%
#292 / 633
View rankingAid worker
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Forms, logframe and the indicators.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
The field, local partners and what the spreadsheet misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Donor reports and the paperwork.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Security, evacuation and the call to stay.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Community, conflict and not replacing the local.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Do no harm and owning the project.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- logframe
- field work
- justify projects
- local partners
- mission security
- aid indicators
- donor reports
- do no harm
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1093.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635