Automation index
How much of a Shelf replenisher’s job can AI already do?
A wave comes earlier. Filling the shelf without blocking the aisle do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Shelf replenisher
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#449 / 653
View rankingShelf replenisher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Wave, location and the cage.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Shelf, date and the one at the back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Aisle, the customer and not blocking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Out of stock, calling it and the gap.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The peak, overtime and not mixing batches.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Shelf full, and aisle clear.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- waves
- the shelf
- dates
- aisles
- stock-outs
- cages
- batches
- gaps
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-5081.00· ESCO/ISCO 9334
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131