Automation index
How much of a Shelf replenisher’s job can AI already do?
A wave comes earlier. Filling the shelf without blocking the aisle do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Shelf replenisher
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#449 / 653
View rankingShelf replenisher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Wave, location and the cage.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Shelf, date and the one at the back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Aisle, the customer and not blocking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Out of stock, calling it and the gap.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The peak, overtime and not mixing batches.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Shelf full, and aisle clear.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- waves
- the shelf
- dates
- aisles
- stock-outs
- cages
- batches
- gaps
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-5081.00· ESCO/ISCO 9334
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211