Automation index
How much of a Shelf replenisher’s job can AI already do?
A wave comes earlier. Filling the shelf without blocking the aisle do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Shelf replenisher
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#523 / 743
View rankingShelf replenisher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Wave, location and the cage.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Shelf, date and the one at the back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Aisle, the customer and not blocking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Out of stock, calling it and the gap.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The peak, overtime and not mixing batches.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Shelf full, and aisle clear.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- waves
- the shelf
- dates
- aisles
- stock-outs
- cages
- batches
- gaps
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-5081.00· ESCO/ISCO 9334
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141