IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Shelf replenisher’s job can AI already do?

A wave comes earlier. Filling the shelf without blocking the aisle do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Shelf replenisher

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Wave, location and the cage.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%36%+5.8
Shelf, date and the one at the back.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

22%10%+2.2
Aisle, the customer and not blocking.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Out of stock, calling it and the gap.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The peak, overtime and not mixing batches.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%18%+2.9
Shelf full, and aisle clear.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

14%12%+1.7
Total100%21%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • waves
  • the shelf
  • dates
  • aisles
  • stock-outs
  • cages
  • batches
  • gaps

Sources for this job· O*NET 43-5081.00· ESCO/ISCO 9334

Spanish language teacher

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Reading, the commentary and the rubric.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • text commentary
  • writing
  • speaking
  • spelling
  • language rubrics
  • plagiarism
  • paragraphs
  • reading

Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 463ENT doctor21%
  2. 464Pediatrician21%
  3. 465Psychiatrist21%
  4. 467Art conservator21%
  5. 468Sommelier21%
  6. 469Taxidermist21%