Automation index
How much of a Shelf replenisher’s job can AI already do?
A wave comes earlier. Filling the shelf without blocking the aisle do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Shelf replenisher
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#435 / 633
View rankingShelf replenisher
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Wave, location and the cage.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Shelf, date and the one at the back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Aisle, the customer and not blocking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Out of stock, calling it and the gap.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The peak, overtime and not mixing batches.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Shelf full, and aisle clear.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- waves
- the shelf
- dates
- aisles
- stock-outs
- cages
- batches
- gaps
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-5081.00· ESCO/ISCO 9334
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 633
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142