Automation index
How much of a Shellfish gatherer’s job can AI already do?
A tide sheet comes earlier. Taking the quota without emptying the bed do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Shellfish gatherer
18%
AI can already do 18% of this job.
#580 / 643
View rankingShellfish gatherer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Tide, quota and the day’s permit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Bed, rake and the cold in the legs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 24% | 6% | +1.4 |
Grade, size and what goes back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Market, the price and the one who does not declare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The toxin, the closure and not going out anyway.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 18% | +2.5 |
The quota, and not emptying the bed.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 10% | +1.4 |
| Total | 100% | 18% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- tide
- quotas
- shellfish beds
- minimum sizes
- the market
- biotoxins
- the rake
- gathering permits
Sources for this job· O*NET 45-3011.00· ESCO/ISCO 6221
IS WORK OVER?
Hydraulic engineer
27%
#166 / 643
View rankingHydraulic engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Hydrology, flows and the floodplain model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Field, section and what LiDAR misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Drainage works, pumps and the outfall.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Water permits and the river authority.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The flood, the village and the yes to the channel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not flood, and not trusting the model alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- model floodplains
- flows
- drainage
- channel works
- water permits
- pumps
- channel sections
- river authority
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142