Automation index
How much of a Ship agent’s job can AI already do?
An ETA comes earlier. Clearing the ship without extra demurrage do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Ship agent
26%
AI can already do 26% of this job.
#229 / 733
View rankingShip agent
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
ETA, berth and port services.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
Clearance, crew and the crew change.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
The master, the terminal and the window clash.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Invoices, disbursements and the owner’s account.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The inspection, the delay and not losing the slot.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
No extra demurrage, and the ship cleared.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ETAs
- berths
- ship clearance
- crew changes
- disbursements
- terminal windows
- owner’s accounts
- port inspections
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-5011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3331
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141